ArticleStatistics in medicine2022
Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying the Partial Order Continual Reassessment Method to High-Dimensional Treatment Combinations.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Method for Inserting Dose Levels Mid-Trial in Early-Phase Oncology Combination Studies.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- A short review of dose-finding adaptive trial designs for clinical pharmacologists and non-statisticians in oncology.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Bayesian model averaging for partial ordering continual reassessment methods.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Using circulating tumor DNA as a novel biomarker of efficacy for dose-finding designs in oncology.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Seamless monotherapy-combination phase I dose-escalation model-based design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Design of a Phase I Drug Combination Study with Adaptive Allocation Based on Dose-Limiting Toxicity Attribution.Cancers · 2025Article
- Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Article
- Optimizing dose-schedule regimens with bayesian adaptive designs: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Early Phase Dose-Finding Designs for CAR-T Cell Therapies.Pharmaceutical statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing medical interest in combining several agents and optimizing their dosing schedules in a single trial in order to optimize the treatment for patients. Evaluating at doses of several drugs and their scheduling in a single Phase I trial simultaneously possess a number of statistical challenges, and specialized methods to tackle these have been proposed in the literature. However, the uptake of these methods is slow and implementation examples of such advanced methods are still sparse to date. In this work, we share our experience of proposing a model-based partial ordering continual reassessment method (POCRM) design for three-dimensional dose-finding in an oncology trial. In the trial, doses of two agents and the dosing schedule of one of them can be escalated/de-escalated. We provide a step-by-step summary on how the POCRM design was implemented and communicated to the trial team. We proposed an approach to specify toxicity orderings and their a-priori probabilities, and developed a number of visualization tools to communicate the statistical properties of the design. The design evaluation included both a comprehensive simulation study and considerations of the individual trial behavior. The study is now enrolling patients. We hope that sharing our experience of the successful implementation of an advanced design in practice that went through evaluations of several health authorities will facilitate a better uptake of more efficient methods in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.