Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428217›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.

Pavel Mozgunov, Thomas Jaki, Ioannis Gounaris, Thomas Goddemeier, Anja Victor, Marianna Grinberg

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavel MozgunovMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-0284
Thomas JakiMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-188X
Ioannis GounarisMerck Serono Ltd., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Feltham, UK.
Thomas GoddemeierBiostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Anja VictorBiostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Marianna GrinbergBiostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

Department of Health BRC-1215-20014Department of Health NIHR300576Department of Health NIHR-SRF-2015-08-001Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing medical interest in combining several agents and optimizing their dosing schedules in a single trial in order to optimize the treatment for patients. Evaluating at doses of several drugs and their scheduling in a single Phase I trial simultaneously possess a number of statistical challenges, and specialized methods to tackle these have been proposed in the literature. However, the uptake of these methods is slow and implementation examples of such advanced methods are still sparse to date. In this work, we share our experience of proposing a model-based partial ordering continual reassessment method (POCRM) design for three-dimensional dose-finding in an oncology trial. In the trial, doses of two agents and the dosing schedule of one of them can be escalated/de-escalated. We provide a step-by-step summary on how the POCRM design was implemented and communicated to the trial team. We proposed an approach to specify toxicity orderings and their a-priori probabilities, and developed a number of visualization tools to communicate the statistical properties of the design. The design evaluation included both a comprehensive simulation study and considerations of the individual trial behavior. The study is now enrolling patients. We hope that sharing our experience of the successful implementation of an advanced design in practice that went through evaluations of several health authorities will facilitate a better uptake of more efficient methods in practice.

Indexed as

Research DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaximum Tolerated Dosecombination studydose-findingdose-schedulepartial ordering

Identifiers

PMID36428217
PMCPMC10100035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.