ArticleInternational dental journal2023
Assessing Enamel Wear of Monolithic Ceramics With Micro-CT and Intra-oral Scanner.
Article in International dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Wear Analysis of Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic Inlays/Onlays After 14 Years.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-unit posterior monolithic fixed dental prostheses made from high-translucent shade-graded zirconia: 3-Year results from a prospective clinical pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Tribological aspects of enamel wear caused by zirconia and lithium disilicate: A meta-narrative review.The Japanese dental science review · 2024Review
- Digital wear analysis of onlay restorations constructed from two pressable glass-based ceramics against natural enamel: An in vitro study.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis in vitro study aimed to investigate enamel wear against 3 monolithic ceramics using 2 methods of measurement.
methodsThree groups of standard flat monolithic ceramic specimens including zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass (Vita Suprinity, VITA Zahnfabrik), yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia (Lava Esthetic Zirconia), and lithium disilicate glass (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared, with human enamel used as the control group. Each specimen was subjected to the 2-body wear test at 49 N for 250,000 cycles. Enamel antagonists were evaluated with micro-computed tomography (CT) and intra-oral scanner, allowing 3-dimensional images of vertical wear and volumetric loss of enamel antagonists to be calculated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests were used to examine the differences in vertical wear/volumetric loss amongst the groups. Paired t tests and intra-class correlations were used to compare vertical wear/volumetric loss between the micro-CT and intra-oral scanner groups.
resultsNo significant difference in vertical wear was found amongst all groups. More volumetric loss was found in all test groups than in the control group (P < .001), but no significant difference was found amongst the test groups. There was a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.535, P = .033) between the vertical wear and volumetric loss. No significant difference between the 2 methods of measurement was found.
conclusionsMonolithic ceramics induce more enamel wear than natural teeth. Both micro-CT and intra-oral scanners can be used for measuring tooth wear with similar performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.