ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2022
NEWS2, patient safety and hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rewiring the Lung-CNS Axis After Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Clinical Disorders in Cystic Fibrosis That Affect Emergency Procedures-A Case Report and Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multicenter Development and Prospective Validation of eCARTv5: A Gradient-Boosted Machine-Learning Early Warning Score.Critical care explorations · 2025Observational
- Accuracy of early warning scores for predicting clinical worsening in COPD patients.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Breaking new ground: machine learning enhances survival forecasts in hypercapnic respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Early Warning Scores With and Without Artificial Intelligence.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The National Early Warning Score: from concept to NHS implementation.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022Review
- Celebrating 10 years of the National Early Warning Score.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022Article
- Prediction of mortality in cardio-neurovascular patients with sepsis and septic shock: is NEWS-2 better than qSOFA, SOFA, and qPitt? An observational study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) has been widely adopted for use in clinical practice in the UK since its introduction in 2012. It is designed to improve patient safety. The original score was adapted in 2017 to improve patient safety further by introducing a separate score for oxygen saturation to be used in selected patients with respiratory diseases. In this article, evidence for the effectiveness of the improved score is reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.