Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36427876›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2022

NEWS2 and the older person.

Emma Rlc Vardy, Daniel Lasserson, Robert O Barker, Barbara Hanratty

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Bedside cognitive screening to detect dementia and predict poor outcomes in hospitals.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma Rlc VardyNorthern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK and School of Health Sciences and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK emma.vardy@nca.nhs.uk.
Daniel LassersonUniversity of Warwick, Warwick, UK and clinical lead, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Robert O BarkerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barbara HanrattyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Academic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBWarwick Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), published in 2012, made no specific adjustments for older people. The updated NEWS2 (2017) incorporated new confusion as a category for consciousness. In this article, we consider the role of NEWS2 in detection of acute clinical deterioration in older people and how the score may be used to inform care, highlighting the additional aspects, such as care escalation decisions, that may ensue. We consider the evidence of NEWS and NEWS2 in assessment of the older person in different settings, including the potential benefits and limitations for care home residents. We suggest that NEWS2 may need adaptation for older people in future iterations, and that it should be used in conjunction with other clinical assessments, such as the Clinical Frailty Scale and the four 'A's test (4AT) for delirium.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreAgedConfusionDeliriumHumansagedeliriumdeteriorationNEWS2older people

Identifiers

PMID36427876
PMCPMC9761433
OpenAlexW4310567687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.