ArticleJournal of affective disorders2023
Deconstructing resilience in patients at high risk for suicidal behavior.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilience and suicidality in the Taiwanese general public: a population-based study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Age matters: a narrative review and machine learning analysis on shared and separate multidimensional risk domains for early and late onset suicidal behavior.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- Resilience-related neural similarity during naturalistic movie watching.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResilience represents coping abilities to overcome exposure to psychopathological risk. In the context of risk factors for suicidal behavior, it is unknown if this attribute is deficient in suicide attempters, how it relates to other measures of risk, and where it may overlap with other risk factors associated with suicidal behavior.
methodsThe present study examined the performance on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in three groups of individuals with familial risk for both mood disorder and suicidal behavior, as well as a healthy comparison group. Other risk factors for suicidal behavior, such as depression severity, hopelessness, and lifetime impulsiveness were examined as well to determine if these mediated group differences in CD-RISC scores.
resultsCD-RISC scores differed between groups, with lowest scores in the past attempter group. However, CD-RISC scores were strongly correlated with other common risk factors for suicide attempt, including hopelessness, subjective depression, and reasons for living, which together explained 68 % of the CD-RISC variance. Group differences in CD-RISC scores were eliminated when the model included these covariates. LIMITATIONS: Sample sizes were modest, and depression severity was low overall and significantly higher in the past suicide attempter group.
conclusionsThe CD-RISC has demonstrated utility for predicting risk for depression, but appears to overlap with other known risk factors for suicidal behavior, especially hopelessness and subjective depression. Though it encapsulates variance from multiple risk factors in a single scale, it may not provide additional predictive power above and beyond these other risk factors for suicidal behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.