ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022
Risk of thrombosis in women with cancer undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female fertility preservation: 25 years of progress, expanding indications and future prospects.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aims to evaluate the risk factors and incidence of thromboembolic events among adult women with cancer who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility preservation.
methodsRetrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of patient demographics, medical history, cancer type/treatment, laboratory values, thrombosis within 6 months of COH.
results4 of 127 study participants experienced a venous thromboembolic event within 6 months of COH. The median time between oocyte aspiration and the event was 0.25 years (range = 0.10-0.50). The average age at time of event was 25.3 years (SD = 5.3). Three of four thrombotic patients had ovarian cancer, one had breast cancer. All had received surgery and chemotherapy for treatment. All underwent an antagonist cycle ovarian stimulation protocol - none developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The average anti-mullerian hormone level at the time of hyperstimulation in the thrombosis group was 1.6 (SD = 1.3), compared to 3.6 in the non-thrombosis group. The average max estradiol level reached during ovarian stimulation was 1281.3 (SD = 665.3) in the thrombosis group and 1839.1 (SD = 1513.9) in the non-thrombosis group. Thromboembolic events were not directly associated with mortality.
conclusionsWithin this small descriptive study, the incidence of thromboembolic events in women with cancer undergoing COH for fertility preservation is high. Cancer may play a greater role than COH in thrombosis risk. Ovarian cancer patients who undergo ovarian stimulation may have an increased risk compared to other cancer types. These findings may inform future, prospective studies to determine the role of thromboprophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.