Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36427098›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023

The ASPECT Hydrocephalus System: a non-hierarchical descriptive system for clinical use.

Joachim Birch Milan, Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen, Nicolas Nørager, Sarah Skovlunde Hornshøj Pedersen, Casper Schwartz Riedel, Nikolaj Malthe Toft, Ahmed Ammar, Mansoor Foroughi, André Grotenhuis, Andrea Perera and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Classifications of hydrocephalus based on Walter Dandy and his paradigm.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Joachim Birch MilanCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thorbjørn Søren Rønn JensenCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicolas NøragerCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sarah Skovlunde Hornshøj PedersenCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Casper Schwartz RiedelCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolaj Malthe ToftCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ahmed AmmarDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Fahd University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Mansoor ForoughiEuropean Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) CSF Task Force, Brussels, Belgium.
André GrotenhuisEuropean Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) CSF Task Force, Brussels, Belgium.
Andrea PereraDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Kings College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.
Harold RekateEuropean Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) CSF Task Force, Brussels, Belgium.
Marianne JuhlerCopenhagen CSF Study Group, Copenhagen, Denmark. marianne.juhler@gmail.com.
Rigshospitalet · DKHofstra University · USImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing's College London · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Wellington Hospital · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with hydrocephalus, prognosis and intervention are based on multiple factors. This includes, but is not limited to, time of onset, patient age, treatment history, and obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow. Consequently, several distinct hydrocephalus classification systems exist. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is universally applied, but in ICD-10 and the upcoming ICD-11, hydrocephalus diagnoses incorporate only a few factors, and the hydrocephalus diagnoses of the ICD systems are based on different clinical measures. As a consequence, multiple diagnoses can be applied to individual cases. Therefore, similar patients may be described with different diagnoses, while clinically different patients may be diagnosed identically. This causes unnecessary dispersion in hydrocephalus diagnostics, rendering the ICD classification of little use for research and clinical decision-making. This paper critically reviews the ICD systems for scientific and functional limitations in the classification of hydrocephalus and presents a new descriptive system. We propose describing hydrocephalus by a system consisting of six clinical key factors of hydrocephalus: A (anatomy); S (symptomatology); P (previous interventions); E (etiology); C (complications); T (time-onset and current age). The "ASPECT Hydrocephalus System" is a systematic, nuanced, and applicable description of patients with hydrocephalus, with a potential to resolve the major issues of previous classifications, thus providing new opportunities for standardized treatment and research.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusHumansPrognosisASPECT Hydrocephalus SystemHydrocephalus

Identifiers

PMID36427098
PMCPMC9922243
OpenAlexW4309947194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.