Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426946›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2022

Monocyte/Macrophage Heterogeneity during Skin Wound Healing in Mice.

Jingbo Pang, Mark Maienschein-Cline, Timothy J Koh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. FPR1-dependent Pro-inflammatory Ccl4Respiratory research · 2025
    Article
  12. Macrophages: sentinels, warriors, and healers.Human molecular genetics · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Fibroblast-Mediated Macrophage Recruitment Supports Acute Wound Healing.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingbo PangCenter for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; and.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-8434
Mark Maienschein-ClineResearch Informatics Core, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-6619-6788
Timothy J KohCenter for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; and.ORCID 0000-0001-6549-7060
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
Macrophage Phenotypes and Tissue RepairR35GM136228 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI TIMOTHY J KOH · 2020 to 2026
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monocytes (Mos)/macrophages (Mϕs) orchestrate biological processes critical for efficient skin wound healing. However, current understanding of skin wound Mo/Mϕ heterogeneity is limited by traditional experimental approaches such as flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Therefore, we sought to more fully explore Mo/Mϕ heterogeneity and associated state transitions during the course of excisional skin wound healing in mice using single-cell RNA sequencing. The live CD45+CD11b+Ly6G- cells were isolated from skin wounds of C57BL/6 mice on days 3, 6, and 10 postinjury and captured using the 10x Genomics Chromium platform. A total of 2813 high-quality cells were embedded into a uniform manifold approximation and projection space, and eight clusters of distinctive cell populations were identified. Cluster dissimilarity and differentially expressed gene analysis categorized those clusters into three groups: early-stage/proinflammatory, late-stage/prohealing, and Ag-presenting phenotypes. Signature gene and Gene Ontology analysis of each cluster provided clues about the different functions of the Mo/Mϕ subsets, including inflammation, chemotaxis, biosynthesis, angiogenesis, proliferation, and cell death. Quantitative PCR assays validated characteristics of early- versus late-stage Mos/Mϕs inferred from our single-cell RNA sequencing dataset. Additionally, cell trajectory analysis by pseudotime and RNA velocity and adoptive transfer experiments indicated state transitions between early- and late-state Mos/Mϕs as healing progressed. Finally, we show that the chemokine Ccl7, which was a signature gene for early-stage Mos/Mϕs, preferentially induced the accumulation of proinflammatory Ly6C+F4/80lo/- Mos/Mϕs in mouse skin wounds. In summary, our data demonstrate the complexity of Mo/Mϕ phenotypes, their dynamic behavior, and diverse functions during normal skin wound healing.

Indexed as

LeukocytesMonocytesAnimalsMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID36426946
PMCPMC9643652
OpenAlexW4298326361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.