ArticleAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2023
Prognostic Importance of Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in Alcoholic Versus Dilated Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart involvement in alcohol use disorder: observational and retrospective study in a specialized hospital unit and long-term follow-up.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Alcoholic cardiomyopathy: an update.European heart journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsLimited data exist to describe the prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and oral anticoagulation on patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy (ACM) compared with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and were investigated in this study.
methodsUsing Danish nationwide registries, a cohort analysis was conducted to assess the prognostic differences for patients with a first diagnosis of ACM versus DCM with and without AF 1994-2018 (followed until end 2019). Our study also assessed differences in mortality following initiation of anticoagulation in both populations.
resultsTotally, 1237 patients with ACM (33% with AF) and 17,211 individuals with DCM (33% with AF) were included. Those with ACM were more often men (89 versus 71%) and younger than patients with DCM (mean age 56 versus 64 years). Cumulative 5-year mortality was greater among patients with ACM, compared with DCM, regardless of AF (ACM with AF 49% [95% CI: 44-54%], ACM without AF 48% [45-53%], DCM with AF 41% [39-42%], DCM without AF 30% [29-31%], P < 0.0001). The prognosis associated with AF was statistically significantly different in people with ACM and DCM (adjusted hazards ratio 0.85 [95% CI: 0.74-0.98] versus 1.04 [1.00-1.09] in ACM and DCM, P < 0.0001). The mortality associated with oral anticoagulation was similar in ACM and DCM (hazards ratio 0.81 [0.61-1.07] versus 0.87 [0.80-0.94], P = 0.49).
conclusionsPatients with ACM had a worse prognosis when compared with patients with DCM, but this did not appear to be driven by AF. Patients with ACM were observed to have similar associated risk benefits of oral anticoagulation as DCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.