Trial reportThe oncologist2023
Nab-paclitaxel Followed by Dose-dense Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03799679 (Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Intensive Epirubicin in Combination With Cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Intensive Epirubicin in Combination With Cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feilike and Its Constituent Licochalcone B Trigger Caspase-3/GSDME-Mediated Pyroptosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer via Modulation of the Mutant p53-Calcium/ER Stress-ROS-MAPK Axis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of generic nab-paclitaxel-based therapy in Chinese patients with malignant tumors in a real-world setting: a multicenter prospective observational study.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anti-tumor activity of nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Asian patients remain unclear, particularly in the aggressive subtype triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this NAC regimen in TNBC.
methodsIn this Simon's two-stage, phase II study, treatment-naïve patients with unilateral primary invasive TNBC were enrolled. Eligible patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 weekly on day 1 for 12 weeks, followed by dose-dense EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) on day 1 for four 2-week cycles. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate.
resultsA total of 55 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. After NAC, tpCR and breast pathological complete response were respectively observed in 43.1% (95% CI, 29.3-57.8) and 49.0% (95% CI, 34.8-63.4) of 51 evaluable patients for pathological response evaluation. 44 had an objective response as their best response (80.0%; 95% CI, 67.0-89.6). No correlations between clinicopathological variables and pathological/clinical response were observed. Grade 3 or more adverse events (AEs) occurred in 63.6% of 55 patients. The most frequent AEs were alopecia. No treatment-related surgical delay or death occurred.
conclusionNab-paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC as NAC demonstrates promising anti-tumor activity and acceptable tolerability for patients with TNBC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799679).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.