Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426674›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Liposomal amphotericin B-the future.

M Hoenigl, R Lewis, F L van de Veerdonk, P E Verweij, O A Cornely

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Amphotericin B in the Era of New Antifungals: Where Will It Stand?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Foreword.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

M HoeniglDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-2824
R LewisDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Infectious Diseases Hospital, IRCSS S'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2002-4339
F L van de VeerdonkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P E VerweijDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center-CWZ Center of Expertise for Mycology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8600-9860
O A CornelyUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-3137
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in medicine have led to a growing number of people with compromised or suppressed immune systems who are susceptible to invasive fungal infections. In particular, severe fungal infections are becoming increasingly common in ICUs, affecting people within and outside of traditional risk groups alike. This is exemplified by the emergence of severe viral pneumonia as a significant risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and the recognition of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and, more recently, COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. The treatment landscape for haematological malignancies has changed considerably in recent years, and some recently introduced targeted agents, such as ibrutinib, are increasing the risk of invasive fungal infections. Consideration must also be given to the risk of drug-drug interactions between mould-active azoles and small-molecule kinase inhibitors. At the same time, infections caused by rare moulds and yeasts are increasing, and diagnosis continues to be challenging. There is growing concern about azole resistance among both moulds and yeasts, mandating continuous surveillance and personalized treatment strategies. It is anticipated that the epidemiology of fungal infections will continue to change and that new populations will be at risk. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment remain the most important predictors of survival, and broad-spectrum antifungal agents will become increasingly important. Liposomal amphotericin B will remain an essential therapeutic agent in the armamentarium needed to manage future challenges, given its broad antifungal spectrum, low level of acquired resistance and limited potential for drug-drug interactions.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentInvasive Fungal InfectionsMycosesPulmonary AspergillosisAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesFungiHumansAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID36426674
PMCPMC9693803
OpenAlexW4309944604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.