Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426575›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of ophthalmology2023

The role of artificial intelligence in analysis of biofluid markers for diagnosis and management of glaucoma: A systematic review.

Aidan Pucchio, Saffire Krance, Daiana R Pur, Arshpreet Bassi, Rafael Miranda, Tina Felfeli

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence for glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aidan PucchioSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8884-1338
Saffire KranceSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Daiana R PurSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Arshpreet BassiSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rafael MirandaToronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tina FelfeliToronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0927-3086
Western University · CAToronto Public Health · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review focuses on utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in analysis of biofluid markers in glaucoma. We detail the accuracy and validity of AI in the exploration of biomarkers to provide insight into glaucoma pathogenesis.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases including Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. Studies pertaining to biofluid marker analysis using AI or bioinformatics in glaucoma were included. Identified studies were critically appraised and assessed for risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools.

resultsA total of 10,258 studies were screened and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 23 cross-sectional studies (59%), nine prospective cohort studies (23%), six retrospective cohort studies (15%), and one case-control study (3%). Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) was the most commonly studied subtype (55% of included studies). Twenty-four studies examined disease characteristics, 10 explored treatment decisions, and 5 provided diagnostic clarification. While studies examined at entire metabolomic or proteomic profiles to determine changes in POAG, there was heterogeneity in the data with over 175 unique, differentially expressed biomarkers reported. Discriminant analysis and artificial neural network predictive models displayed strong differentiating ability between glaucoma patients and controls, although these tools were untested in a clinical context.

conclusionThe use of AI models could inform glaucoma diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity. While insight into differentially expressed biomarkers is valuable in pathogenic exploration, no clear pathogenic mechanism in glaucoma has emerged.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesProteomicsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersartificial intelligencebiofluiddiagnosisglaucomapathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID36426575
PMCPMC10469503
OpenAlexW4310051804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.