Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426573›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Baseline pupil size encodes task-related information and modulates the task-evoked response in a speech-in-noise task.

Helia Relaño-Iborra, Dorothea Wendt, Mihaela Beatrice Neagu, Abigail Anne Kressner, Torsten Dau, Per Bækgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helia Relaño-IborraCognitive Systems Section, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 5205Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2899-1673
Dorothea Wendt263099Eriksholm Research Center, Oticon, 3070 Snekkersten, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-1180
Mihaela Beatrice NeaguHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, 5205Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5737-4861
Abigail Anne KressnerHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, 5205Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-3948
Torsten DauHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, 5205Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-4343
Per BækgaardCognitive Systems Section, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 5205Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pupillometry data are commonly reported relative to a baseline value recorded in a controlled pre-task condition. In this study, the influence of the experimental design and the preparatory processing related to task difficulty on the baseline pupil size was investigated during a speech intelligibility in noise paradigm. Furthermore, the relationship between the baseline pupil size and the temporal dynamics of the pupil response was assessed. The analysis revealed strong effects of block presentation order, within-block sentence order and task difficulty on the baseline values. An interaction between signal-to-noise ratio and block order was found, indicating that baseline values reflect listener expectations arising from the order in which the different blocks were presented. Furthermore, the baseline pupil size was found to affect the slope, delay and curvature of the pupillary response as well as the peak pupil dilation. This suggests that baseline correction might be sufficient when reporting pupillometry results in terms of mean pupil dilation only, but not when a more complex characterization of the temporal dynamics of the response is considered. By clarifying which factors affect baseline pupil size and how baseline values interact with the task-evoked response, the results from the present study can contribute to a better interpretation of the pupillary response as a marker of cognitive processing.

Indexed as

NoisePupilHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioSpeech Intelligibilitybaseline pupil sizegrowth curve analysislistening effortpupillometry

Identifiers

PMID36426573
PMCPMC9703509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.