Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426565›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Artificial Intellgence in the Era of Precision Oncological Imaging.

Michaela Cellina, Maurizio Cè, Natallia Khenkina, Polina Sinichich, Marco Cervelli, Vittoria Poggi, Sara Boemi, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tumor metrics imaging core labs: primer for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapy-Induced Senescence: Novel Approaches for Markers Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michaela CellinaRadiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-1971
Maurizio CèPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Natallia KhenkinaPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Polina SinichichPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Marco CervelliPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Vittoria PoggiPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Sara BoemiPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria IerardiRadiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, 9304Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid-paced development and adaptability of artificial intelligence algorithms have secured their almost ubiquitous presence in the field of oncological imaging. Artificial intelligence models have been created for a variety of tasks, including risk stratification, automated detection, and segmentation of lesions, characterization, grading and staging, prediction of prognosis, and treatment response. Soon, artificial intelligence could become an essential part of every step of oncological workup and patient management. Integration of neural networks and deep learning into radiological artificial intelligence algorithms allow for extrapolating imaging features otherwise inaccessible to human operators and pave the way to truly personalized management of oncological patients.Although a significant proportion of currently available artificial intelligence solutions belong to basic and translational cancer imaging research, their progressive transfer to clinical routine is imminent, contributing to the development of a personalized approach in oncology. We thereby review the main applications of artificial intelligence in oncological imaging, describe the example of their successful integration into research and clinical practice, and highlight the challenges and future perspectives that will shape the field of oncological radiology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingAlgorithmsHumansMedical OncologyNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligencediagnostic imagingmachine learningoncologyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID36426565
PMCPMC9703524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.