Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426378›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2023

Presentation, management, and outcomes of cauda equina syndrome up to one year after surgery, using clinician and participant reporting: A multi-centre prospective cohort study.

Julie Woodfield, Ingrid Hoeritzauer, Aimun A B Jamjoom, Josephine Jung, Simon Lammy, Savva Pronin, Cathal J Hannan, Anna Watts, Laura Hughes, Richard D C Moon and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06416878 (Can Brief Perioperative Epidural Electrical Stimulation Improve Recovery of Autonomic Function in Cauda Equina Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06416878 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Can Brief Perioperative Epidural Electrical Stimulation Improve Recovery of Autonomic Function in Cauda Equina Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LiverpoolRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsCauda Equina SyndromeArmsBrief ES at the time of decompression for cauda equina syndrome, Brief ES to facilitate mcturition/removal of catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cauda equina syndrome: a structured approach for the higher orthopaedic examination.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Sexual dysfunction after cauda equina syndrome: a systematic review of long-term outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Physiotherapist's Management of Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome in the United Kingdom: A National Survey.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Assessment of cauda equina syndrome: new national guidelines and implications for primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Is out-of-hours decompression for acute lumbar disc herniation associated with greater peri-operative complications? A tertiary centre, retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emergencies in inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Julie WoodfieldDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Ingrid HoeritzauerDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Aimun A B JamjoomDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Josephine JungKing's College Hospital, London, UK.
Simon LammyInstitute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Savva ProninCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cathal J HannanThe Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Anna WattsSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Laura HughesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Richard D C MoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Stacey DarwishDepartment of Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Holly RoySouthwest Neurosurgical Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
Phillip C CopleyDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael T C PoonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Paul ThorpeMusgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
Nisaharan SrikandarajahThe Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Gordan GrahovacKing's College Hospital, London, UK.
Andreas K DemetriadesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Niall EamesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Philip J SellUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Patrick F X StathamDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
UCES Collaborators
British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative
NHS Lothian · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBDerriford Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GBMusgrove Park Hospital · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) results from nerve root compression in the lumbosacral spine, usually due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc. Evidence for management of CES is limited by its infrequent occurrence and lack of standardised clinical definitions and outcome measures. Methods: This is a prospective multi-centre observational cohort study of adults with CES in the UK. We assessed presentation, investigation, management, and all Core Outcome Set domains up to one year post-operatively using clinician and participant reporting. Univariable and multivariable associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and urinary outcomes were investigated. Findings: In 621 participants with CES, catheterisation for urinary retention was required pre-operatively in 31% (191/615). At discharge, only 13% (78/616) required a catheter. Median time to surgery from symptom onset was 3 days (IQR:1-8) with 32% (175/545) undergoing surgery within 48 h. Earlier surgery was associated with catheterisation (OR:2.2, 95%CI:1.5-3.3) but not with admission ODI or radiological compression. In multivariable analyses catheter requirement at discharge was associated with pre-operative catheterisation (OR:10.6, 95%CI:5.8-20.4) and one-year ODI was associated with presentation ODI (r = 0.3, 95%CI:0.2-0.4), but neither outcome was associated with time to surgery or radiological compression. Additional healthcare services were required by 65% (320/490) during one year follow up. Interpretation: Post-operative functional improvement occurred even in those presenting with urinary retention. There was no association between outcomes and time to surgery in this observational study. Significant healthcare needs remained post-operatively. Funding: DCN Endowment Fund funded study administration. Castor EDC provided database use. No other study funding was received.

Indexed as

Back painCauda equina syndromeCohort studySpinal surgeryUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID36426378
PMCPMC9678980
OpenAlexW4309263893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.