ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Towards survival prediction of cancer patients using medical images.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the power of longitudinal medical imaging for eye disease prognosis using Transformer-based sequence modeling.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Automatic pulmonary artery-vein separation in CT images using a twin-pipe network and topology reconstruction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival prediction of a patient is a critical task in clinical medicine for physicians and patients to make an informed decision. Several survival and risk scoring methods have been developed to estimate the survival score of patients using clinical information. For instance, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores are developed for the survival prediction of heart patients. Recently, state-of-the-art medical imaging and analysis techniques have paved the way for survival prediction of cancer patients by understanding key features extracted from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) scanned images with the help of image processing and machine learning techniques. However, survival prediction is a challenging task due to the complexity in benchmarking of image features, feature selection methods, and machine learning models. In this article, we evaluate the performance of 156 visual features from radiomic and hand-crafted feature classes, six feature selection methods, and 10 machine learning models to benchmark their performance. In addition, MRI scanned Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) and CT scanned non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) datasets are used to train classification and regression models. Our results highlight that logistic regression outperforms for the classification with 66 and 54% accuracy for BraTS and NSCLC datasets, respectively. Moreover, our analysis of best-performing features shows that age is a common and significant feature for survival prediction. Also, gray level and shape-based features play a vital role in regression. We believe that the study can be helpful for oncologists, radiologists, and medical imaging researchers to understand and automate the procedure of decision-making and prognosis of cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.