Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426117›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2022

Comparative study of the evolution of cancer gene duplications across fish.

Ciara Baines, Richard Meitern, Randel Kreitsberg, Tuul Sepp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolutionary study of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in breast carcinoma.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Extensive longevity and DNA virus-driven adaptation in nearcticbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ciara BainesInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia.
Richard MeiternInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-3002
Randel KreitsbergInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia.
Tuul SeppInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative studies of cancer-related genes not only provide novel information about their evolution and function but also an understanding of cancer as a driving force in biological systems and species' life histories. So far, these studies have focused on mammals. Here, we provide the first comparative study of cancer-related gene copy number variation in fish. Fishes are a paraphyletic group whose last common ancestor is also an ancestor of the tetrapods, and accordingly, their tumour suppression mechanisms should include most of the mammalian mechanisms and also reveal novel (but potentially phylogenetically older) previously undetected mechanisms. We have matched the sequenced genomes of 65 fish species from the Ensemble database with the cancer gene information from the COSMIC database. By calculating the number of gene copies across species using the Ensembl CAFE data (providing species trees for gene copy number counts), we used a less resource-demanding method for homolog identification. Our analysis demonstrates a masked relationship between cancer-related gene copy number variation (CNV) and maximum lifespan in fish species, suggesting that a higher number of copies of tumour suppressor genes lengthens and the number of copies of oncogenes shortens lifespan. Based on the positive correlation between the number of copies of tumour suppressors and oncogenes, we show which species have more tumour suppressors in relation to oncogenes. It could be suggested that these species have stronger genetic defences against oncogenic processes. Fish studies could be a largely unexplored treasure trove for understanding the evolution and ecology of cancer, providing novel insights into the study of cancer and tumour suppression, in addition to fish evolution, life-history trade-offs, and ecology.

Indexed as

cancer defense mechanismscancer evolutionfish cancerfish evolutiontumor suppressionwildlife cancer

Identifiers

PMID36426117
PMCPMC9679246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.