Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36426086›Full record

ArticleData in brief2022

VegNet: Dataset of vegetable quality images for machine learning applications.

Yogesh Suryawanshi, Kailas Patil, Prawit Chumchu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A comprehensive lemongrass (Data in brief · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Data in brief · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yogesh SuryawanshiVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Kailas PatilVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Prawit ChumchuKasetsart University, Sriracha, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agricultural industry has an unmet requirement for quick and accurate classification or recognition of vegetables according to the quality criteria. This open research problem draws attention to the research scholars every time. The classification and object detection challenges have seen highly encouraging outcomes from machine learning and deep learning techniques. The foundational condition for developing precise and reliable machine learning models for the real-time context is a neat and clean dataset. With this goal in mind, we have developed a picture dataset of four popular vegetables in India that are also highly exported worldwide. In order to generate a dataset, we have taken into account four vegetables: Bell Peppers, Tomatoes, Chili Peppers, and New Mexico Chiles. The dataset is divided into four vegetable folders, including Bell Pepper, Tomato, Chili Pepper, and New Mexico Chile. Further each vegetable folder contains five subfolders namely (1) Unripe, (2) Ripe, (3) Old, and (4) Dried (5) Damaged. The image collection includes a total of 6850 pictures of vegetables in dataset. We firmly feel that the provided dataset is very beneficial for developing, evaluating, and validating a machine learning model for vegetable categorization or reorganization.

Indexed as

Computer visionConvolutional neural networkDeep learningMachine learningVegetable classificationVegetable detectionVegetable image dataset

Identifiers

PMID36426086
PMCPMC9679474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.