ArticleData in brief2022
Heavy metal tolerance in Scopelophila cataractae: Transcriptomic and epigenetic datasets.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Environmental gradients shape genetic variation in the desert moss, Syntrichia caninervis Mitt. (Pottiaceae).Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying how different plant groups deal with heavy metal exposure is crucial to improve our understanding of the diversity of molecular mechanisms involved in plant stress response. Here, we used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and epigenotyping by sequencing (epiGBS) to assess gene expression and DNA methylation changes respectively in plants from four populations of the metallophyte moss Scopelophila cataractae treated with Cd or Cu in the laboratory. We built RNA-seq and epiGBS sequencing libraries from control and treated samples from each population and sequenced them using Illumina HiSeq 3000 (PE-150 bp) and Illumina HiSeq X-Ten System (PE-150 bp) respectively. For the RNA-seq data, we performed a read quality filter, mapped the reads to the de novo transcriptome created with Trinity, and estimated transcript abundance for each sample. For the epiGBS data, we used a custom pipeline (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7040291) to map the reads to a de novo reference genome and performed strand-specific nucleotide (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) and methylation (single cytosine methylation polymorphisms, SMPs) variant calling. We filtered out SNPs and SMPs with low coverage within (positions with <10 sequencing reads per sample) and across samples (positions with poor representation on the full set of samples). Finally, we performed pairwise comparisons between control and treated samples from each population and identified differentially expressed genes and differentially methylated cytosines associated to heavy metal exposure. We payed particular attention to the different responses of the more and the less tolerant populations of S. cataractae. These datasets could contribute to future comparative studies of abiotic stress response across plant groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.