ArticleData in brief2022
Data on the clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of patient-centred rehabilitation for patients with non-communicable disease living in low-resourced settings.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this data article, we present data obtained from a randomized clinical trial aimed at determining the feasibility of patient-centred rehabilitation for people with non-communicable disease (NCD) living in a low-resource setting. Patients were identified at primary care level and considered eligible if having on or more of the NCDs central to the NCD burden of disease (Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Pulmonary Disease or Cancer). Using a "trial within cohort" design, a total 74 patients were included (36% of those identified as eligible) in a longitudinal cohort with repeated assessments at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks. A subset of 50 participants were randomly selected and offered to participate in a 6-week exercise and education-based, minimalistic, community-based rehabilitation program tailored to the low-resource context. The exercise component included aerobic and resistance exercise, as well as thematic empowerment aimed at improving exercise self-efficacy. The education component was aimed at improving general health literacy. Data was collected in terms of feasibility parameters (e.g., uptake, adherence), patient-demographics (e.g., age, gender), medical demographics (e.g., disease burden, multimorbidity), functional capacity measures (e.g., 6-minute Walk Test), and patient-reported outcomes (e.g., health-related quality of life). The data presented can give a basis for further clinical research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.