ArticleData in brief2022
Datasets describing the morphometric evaluation of the adult rat mandible following growth stimulation of the condyle using ultrasound.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound image dataset for ovarian follicular development detection in pigs.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Datasets describing the morphometric evaluation of the adult rat mandible following growth stimulation of the condyle using ultrasound.Data in brief · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating morphological changes of the mandible due to the unique role of the condyle in mandibular special growth and remodeling pattern is challenging. This data describes a comprehensive evaluation using new techniques to detect morphological changes of the young adult rat mandibles treated by low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) comparing to matching controls. Two-dimensional (2D) analysis was performed on digital photographs of the hemi-mandibles using AutoCAD software with high accuracy. The anatomical points which were more determinative and prone to visual illusion were defined with particularity. Selective combination of measurements was done to allow for a thorough morphometric evaluation of the mandible focusing on the condyle and the main direction of condylar and mandibular growth. The procedure was simulated for three-dimensional analysis of virtual models of the hemi-mandibles via Geomagic-Qualify software. In the whole procedures, conditions were strictly standardized to ensure reliability and repeatability. Further Insights, Interpretations and discussions of the present datasets can be find in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101122[1].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.