Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425899›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Current situation of shared decision making in osteoporosis: A comprehensive literature review of patient decision aids and decision drivers.

Xavier Nogués, María Cristina Carbonell, Laura Canals, Luis Lizán, Santiago Palacios

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Recommendations on screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patients' preferences for fracture risk communication: the Risk Communication in Osteoporosis (RICO) study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xavier NoguésInternal Medicine Department, Instituto de investigación hospital del Mar (IMIM)-Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES) Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
María Cristina CarbonellDepartment of Medicine, Atenció Primària Barcelona-Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Grupo GREMPAL Universidad de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Laura CanalsDepartment of Medicine Amgen Europe Risch-Rotkreuz Switzerland.
Luis LizánDepartment of Outcomes Research Outcomes'10 Castellón de la Plana Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-2454
Santiago PalaciosInstituto Palacios Salud de la Mujer Madrid Spain.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHInstitut Català de la Salut · ESInstituto Palacios · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microstructural deterioration of bone tissues, resulting in bone fragility and increased fracture risk. It is the most common bone-related disease in the population. However, the proportion of patients who start treatment but discontinue it during the first year is very high (around 50%). Endeavors are made to promote patient participation in treatment by implementing patient decision aids (PDA), whose function is to help the patient make disease-related decisions. We aim to summarize the characteristics of the currently available PDA for osteoporosis, as well as deciding factors. Methods: Comprehensive review of the literature. Results: Currently, eleven PDAs can be found for osteoporosis. These PDA have different characteristics or options such as information about treatments tailored to patient needs, graphic information of the results (to facilitate understanding), personal histories (learning), tests to check the knowledge acquired, provision of evidence, clinical practice guidelines or a final summary to share with their doctor. Only five of these PDAs can be considered complete since they provide relevant disease information and therapeutic options to the patient, promote patient's reflection and foment patient-physician discussion. Conclusions: This study provides an update on the current state of decision making on osteoporosis and available PDA, which can help engage the patient through shared decision-making by considering, among other things, patient preferences. Physicians should consider PDA, as it may promote adherence and effectiveness of treatment.

Indexed as

osteoporosispatient decision aidsreviewshare decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID36425899
PMCPMC9679236
OpenAlexW4309735705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.