ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tract cancer by detecting mutations and methylation changes in bile samples.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging omics diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Evolving techniques to optimize ERCP-based sampling and evaluation of malignant biliary strictures.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Lipidomic profiling of human bile distinguishes cholangiocarcinoma from benign bile duct diseases with high specificity and sensitivity: a prospective descriptive study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Usefulness of multigene liquid biopsy of bile for identifying driver genes of biliary duct cancers.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Recent Advancement in Diagnosis of Biliary Tract Cancer through Pathological and Molecular Classifications.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with pancreatobiliary tract cancer usually have a poor clinical outcome, with a 5-year overall survival rate below 20%. This is mainly associated with the late diagnosis. In addition, the standard-of-care for patients with malignant biliary stenosis involves a major surgery, the Whipple procedure. An accurate preoperative diagnosis, including differentiation from benign diseases, is critical to avoid unnecessary treatment. Here we developed BileScreen, a sensitive detection modality for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tract cancer based on massively parallel sequencing mutation and methylation changes in bile samples. Methods: A total of 338 patients, from five hospitals in China, with pancreatobiliary system disorders were enrolled in this study between November 2018 and October 2020, and 259 were included for the analysis of BileScreen. We profiled 23 gene mutations and 44 genes with methylation modifications in parallel from bile samples, and set up a model for the detection of malignancy based on multi-level biomarkers. Findings: We applied the BileScreen assay in a training cohort (n = 104) to set up the model and algorithm. The model was further evaluated in a validation cohort (n = 105), resulting in 92% sensitivity and 98% specificity. The performance of BileScreen was further assessed in a prospective test cohort (n = 50) of patients diagnosed with suspicious or negative pathology by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and were confirmed in follow-up. BileScreen yielded 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity, and outcompeted serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in all three cohorts, especially in terms of specificity. Interpretation: Taken together, BileScreen has the ability to interrogate mutations and methylation changes in bile samples in parallel, thus rendering it a potentially sensitive detection method to help in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tract cancer in a safe, convenient and less-invasive manner. Funding: This study was supported by the Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2020-2-4025 to S.H.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972311 to H.Z.), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2017-12M-4-002 to H.Z.), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-066 to CJQ), the Non-profit Central Research Institution Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310026 to H.Z.) and Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM202011010 to H.Z.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.