ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Radiomics features from perihematomal edema for prediction of prognosis in the patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting 90-Day Prognosis of Patients With Primary Basal Ganglia Cerebral Hemorrhage After Microscopic Keyhole Craniotomy for Hematoma Removal.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Development of a risk predication model for critical care needs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort.BMC nursing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We developed and validated a clinical-radiomics nomogram to predict the prognosis of basal ganglia hemorrhage patients. Methods: Retrospective analyses were conducted in 197 patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage (training cohort: Results: The clinical model conducted by four clinical risk factors and 12 radiomcis features were used to establish the Rad-score. The clinical-radiomics nomogram outperformed the clinical model in the training cohort [area under the curve (AUC), 0.92 vs. 0.85] and the test cohort (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.85). The clinical-radiomics nomogram showed good calibration and clinical benefit in both the training and test cohorts. Conclusion: Radiomics features of PHE in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage could contribute to the outcome prediction. The clinical-radiomics nomogram may help first-line clinicians to make individual clinical treatment decisions for patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.