Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425797›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on spasticity evaluated with modified Ashworth scale/Ashworth scale in patients with spastic paralysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jia-Xin Pan, Ying-Xiu Diao, Hui-Yuan Peng, Xi-Zhen Wang, Lin-Rong Liao, Mao-Yuan Wang, You-Liang Wen, Yan-Bing Jia, Hao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [The research progress on the improvement effect of repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb and lower limb spasm after stroke].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Emerging theory of sensitization in post-stroke muscle spasticity.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Xin PanSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Ying-Xiu DiaoSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Hui-Yuan PengDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China.
Xi-Zhen WangSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Lin-Rong LiaoRehabilitation Medicine Center, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
Mao-Yuan WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
You-Liang WenSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Yan-Bing JiaSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Hao LiuSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Weifang Medical University · CNGannan Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spasticity is a common motor disorder resulting from upper motor neuron lesions. It has a serious influence on an individual's motor function and daily activity. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive and painless approach developed for therapeutic intervention in clinical rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of this intervention on spasticity in patients with spastic paralysis remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of rPMS on spasticity, motor function, and activities of daily living in individuals with spastic paralysis. Methods: PubMed, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible papers with date up to March 31, 2022. Two independent researchers conducted study screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. RCTs that explored the effects of rPMS on spasticity, motor function, and activities of daily living in patients with spastic paralysis were included for review. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess methodological quality. The cumulative effects of available data were processed for a meta-analysis using Reedman software. Results: Eight studies with 297 participants were included. Most of the studies presented low to moderate risk of bias. Compared with the control group, the results showed that rPMS had a significant effect on spasticity (all spasticity outcomes: standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.94 to -0.16, Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrated that the evidence supported rPMS in improving spasticity especially for passive muscle properties evaluated with Modified Ashworth Scale/Ashworth Scale, as well as motor function and daily activity of living in individuals with spastic paralysis. Study registration: The reviewed protocol of this study is registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022322395). Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42022322395.

Indexed as

meta-analysisrehabilitationrepetitive peripheral magnetic stimulationspasticitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36425797
PMCPMC9679494
OpenAlexW4308459808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.