ArticleRSC advances2022
Simulation and analysis of lead-free perovskite solar cells incorporating cerium oxide as electron transporting layer.
Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale analysis of RbRSC advances · 2025Article
- Computational insights into wide bandgap lead free perovskite solar cells for silicon based tandem configurations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational analysis of LiMgIRSC advances · 2025Article
- Optimizing CsRSC advances · 2025Article
- Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges in Perovskite Solar Cell Components for Innovative Photovoltaics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Enhancing perovskite solar cell performance through PbIRSC advances · 2024Article
- Fullerene-CRSC advances · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of the current progresses and material advances in perovskite solar cells.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Insights into the photovoltaic properties of indium sulfide as an electron transport material in perovskite solar cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Conductivity and aging behavior of Sr(TiRSC advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The great demand for renewable energy has greatly contributed to the development of the solar cell industry. Recently, silicon solar cells have dominated the world market. The ease of processing gives perovskite solar cells (PSCs) an advantage over conventional silicon solar cells. Regular silicon photovoltaics require expensive, multi-step processes accomplished in a specialized ultraclean-chamber facility at an elevated temperature (>1000 °C) and highly vacuumed workspace. Hence, researchers and the solar cell industry have focused on PSC as a great rival to silicon solar cells. Despite this, the highest efficiency was obtained from lead-based PSC, which has a considerably high toxicity issue and low stability related to lead content, so the research field pays attention to lead-free perovskite solar cells. In this digital simulation, tin-based perovskite in this paper, methylammonium tin iodide (MASnI
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.