ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Assessment of photoreceptor function with ultrafast retinal densitometry.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantification of optical lensing by cellular structures in the living human eye.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Improved tracking of corneal immune cell dynamics usingBiomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Introduction to the Feature Issue on Adaptive Optics for Biomedical Applications.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Evolution of adaptive optics retinal imaging [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Assessment of photoreceptor function with ultrafast retinal densitometry.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optical density of visual pigment can be measured by imaging the dark-adapted eye while bleaching with visible light. This measurement can be made for individual photoreceptor cells using adaptive optics; however, activation of the phototransduction cascade imparts rapid changes in phase that modulate the signal via optical interference. This limits utility because data must be averaged over many experimental runs. Here we used a "flood" illuminated adaptive optics system at 4000 fps, bright light to achieve rapid bleaching, and broad illumination bandwidth to mitigate interference effects. Data were super-resolved using the natural motion of the eye to overcome the reduced pixel resolution of the ultrafast camera. This approach was applied to classify the trichromatic cone photoreceptor mosaic at a single fixation locus within the foveal region of 3 healthy subjects. Subjects were dark adapted for 6 minutes to replenish cone photopigment. This was followed either directly by imaging at 555 ± 50 nm, or by first pre-adapting the retina to 700 nm light to preferentially deplete "L" cone pigment. A total of 3,252 cones were classified as either "S", "M", or "L" type based on clustering of the intensity data observed under these two conditions. Mean classification probability ranged from 99.3 to 99.8%, with individual cell probabilities exceeding 95% in 97.0 to 99.2% of cones. Accuracy of cone classification peaked when using the first 10-30 ms of data, with significant reductions in accuracy noted with the inclusion of data from later times. Our results show that rapid bleaching and data acquisition significantly improve the robustness of cell-resolved densitometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.