ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
White blood cell classification via a discriminative region detection assisted feature aggregation network.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A universal visual foundation model for computational cytopathology.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Aligning deep learning and interpretable models for blood cell classification: A dual-model framework for explainability.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Test-Time Augmentation for Cross-Domain Leukocyte Classification via OOD Filtering and Self-Ensembling.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep generative classification of blood cell morphology.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- A hybrid approach based on multipath Swin transformer and ConvMixer for white blood cells classification.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Multi-kernel driven 3D convolutional neural network for automated detection of lung nodules in chest CT scans.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- A New Artificial Intelligence Approach Using Extreme Learning Machine as the Potentially Effective Model to Predict and Analyze the Diagnosis of Anemia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
White blood cell (WBC) classification plays an important role in human pathological diagnosis since WBCs will show different appearance when they fight with various disease pathogens. Although many previous white blood cell classification have been proposed and earned great success, their classification accuracy is still significantly affected by some practical issues such as uneven staining, boundary blur and nuclear intra-class variability. In this paper, we propose a deep neural network for WBC classification via discriminative region detection assisted feature aggregation (DRFA-Net), which can accurately locate the WBC area to boost final classification performance. Specifically, DRFA-Net uses an adaptive feature enhancement module to refine multi-level deep features in a bilateral manner for efficiently capturing both high-level semantic information and low-level details of WBC images. Considering the fact that background areas could inevitably produce interference, we design a network branch to detect the WBC area with the supervision of segmented ground truth. The bilaterally refined features obtained from two directions are finally aggregated for final classification, and the detected WBC area is utilized to highlight the features of discriminative regions by an attention mechanism. Extensive experiments on several public datasets are conducted to validate that our proposed DRFA-Net can obtain higher accuracies when compared with other state-of-the-art WBC classification methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.