Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425579›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Cell penetrating peptide: A potent delivery system in vaccine development.

Behnam Hasannejad-Asl, Farkhondeh Pooresmaeil, Shahla Takamoli, Mehran Dabiri, Azam Bolhassani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Behnam Hasannejad-AslDepartment of Hepatitis and AIDS, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Farkhondeh PooresmaeilDepartment of Hepatitis and AIDS, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Shahla TakamoliDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Mehran DabiriDepartment of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Azam BolhassaniDepartment of Hepatitis and AIDS, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRUniversity of Guilan · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main obstacles to most medication administrations (such as the vaccine constructs) is the cellular membrane's inadequate permeability, which reduces their efficiency. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) or protein transduction domains (PTDs) are well-known as potent biological nanocarriers to overcome this natural barrier, and to deliver membrane-impermeable substances into cells. The physicochemical properties of CPPs, the attached cargo, concentration, and cell type substantially influence the internalization mechanism. Although the exact mechanism of cellular uptake and the following processing of CPPs are still uncertain; but however, they can facilitate intracellular transfer through both endocytic and non-endocytic pathways. Improved endosomal escape efficiency, selective cell targeting, and improved uptake, processing, and presentation of antigen by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) have been reported by CPPs. Different

Indexed as

cell-penetrating peptidesCPP classificationinfectious and non-infectious diseasesphysicochemical propertiesprotein transduction domainsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36425579
PMCPMC9679422
OpenAlexW4308424095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.