Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep learning for the diagnosis of suspicious thyroid nodules based on multimodal ultrasound images.

Yi Tao, Yanyan Yu, Tong Wu, Xiangli Xu, Quan Dai, Hanqing Kong, Lei Zhang, Weidong Yu, Xiaoping Leng, Weibao Qiu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Application and prospects of AI-based radiomics in ultrasound diagnosis.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yi TaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yanyan YuThe National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Tong WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiangli XuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Harbin, Harbin, China.
Quan DaiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hanqing KongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Weidong YuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiaoping LengDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Weibao QiuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy, Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jiawei TianDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNShenzhen University Health Science Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to differentially diagnose thyroid nodules (TNs) of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3-5 categories using a deep learning (DL) model based on multimodal ultrasound (US) images and explore its auxiliary role for radiologists with varying degrees of experience. Methods: Preoperative multimodal US images of 1,138 TNs of TI-RADS 3-5 categories were randomly divided into a training set (n = 728), a validation set (n = 182), and a test set (n = 228) in a 4:1:1.25 ratio. Grayscale US (GSU), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), strain elastography (SE), and region of interest mask (Mask) images were acquired in both transverse and longitudinal sections, all of which were confirmed by pathology. In this study, fivefold cross-validation was used to evaluate the performance of the proposed DL model. The diagnostic performance of the mature DL model and radiologists in the test set was compared, and whether DL could assist radiologists in improving diagnostic performance was verified. Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) were obtained. Results: The AUCs of DL in the differentiation of TNs were 0.858 based on (GSU + SE), 0.909 based on (GSU + CDFI), 0.906 based on (GSU + CDFI + SE), and 0.881 based (GSU + Mask), which were superior to that of 0.825-based single GSU ( Conclusion: The DL models based on multimodal US images showed exceptional performance in the differential diagnosis of suspicious TNs, effectively increased the diagnostic efficacy of TN evaluations by junior radiologists, and provided an objective assessment for the clinical and surgical management phases that follow.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnosismultimodalthyroid noduleultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36425556
PMCPMC9680169
OpenAlexW4308583581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.