ArticleBiophysical reports2021
Calibration-free counting of low molecular copy numbers in single DNA-PAINT localization clusters.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- Cryosectioning-enhanced super-resolution microscopy for single-protein imaging across cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- DNA-PAINT Imaging with Hydrogel Imprinting and Clearing.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Development of gene-in-plasmid DNA reference materials certified by single-molecule counting.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- A Bayesian Model to Count the Number of Two-State Emitters in a Diffraction Limited Spot.Nano letters · 2025Article
- Membrane topography and the overestimation of protein clustering in single molecule localisation microscopy - identification and correction.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Quantitative Imaging With DNA-PAINT for Applications in Synaptic Neuroscience.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has revolutionized light microscopy by enabling optical resolution down to a few nanometer. Yet, localization precision commonly does not suffice to visually resolve single subunits in molecular assemblies or multimeric complexes. Because each targeted molecule contributes localizations during image acquisition, molecular counting approaches to reveal the target copy numbers within localization clusters have been persistently proposed since the early days of SMLM, most of which rely on preliminary knowledge of the dye photophysics or on a calibration to a reference. Previously, we developed localization-based fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (lbFCS) as an absolute ensemble counting approach for the SMLM-variant DNA-PAINT (points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography), for the first time, to our knowledge, circumventing the necessity for reference calibrations. Here, we present an extended concept termed lbFCS+, which allows absolute counting of copy numbers for individual localization clusters in a single DNA-PAINT image. In lbFCS+, absolute counting of fluorescent loci contained in individual nanoscopic volumes is achieved via precise measurement of the local hybridization rates of the fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides ("imagers") employed in DNA-PAINT imaging. In proof-of-principle experiments on DNA origami nanostructures, we demonstrate the ability of lbFCS+ to truthfully determine molecular copy numbers and imager association and dissociation rates in well-separated localization clusters containing up to 10 docking strands. For
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.