ArticleHeliyon2022
Energy analysis of gait in patients with down syndrome.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immediate effects of Vojta Therapy on gait ability in down syndrome patients: a pilot study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: the primary aim of this study is to analyse the energy parameters of patients with Down syndrome compared to a control group and secondly to verify whether the sport activity leads to differences in energy expenditure. Methods: 3 groups of subjects were identified: 8 healthy subjects and 147 subjects with Down syndrome, of whom 14 played sports at least once a week. An energy index was calculated, given by the ratio between potential and kinetic energy. Next, kinetic ad potential energy parameters were extrapolated at 60% of the gait cycle (propulsion phase). Findings: Down syndrome group was compared with the control group and emerged that the energy index was higher in the first one. No changes were found between Down syndrome and Down syndrome Sport groups. The analysis of the energy parameters showed that all parameters, except the medio-lateral kinetic energy, were higher in the control than in the Down syndrome groups. The potential energy, medio-lateral kinetic energy, and vertical were higher in the Down syndrome Sport group than in the Down syndrome group. The kinetic energy and the mean velocity were higher in the control group than in Down syndrome Sport group while the medio-lateral kinetic energy was lower. Interpretation: sport modified the parameter of potential energy but not that of kinetic energy, which continued to be different compared to the healthy group and increased the oscillations in the medio-lateral plane, which were double compared to Down syndrome group. The increase in potential energy, found to be almost equal to that of control group, indicates an increase in vertical oscillations. This could be because subjects who practise sports have stronger muscles that allow a greater push-off ability, which therefore increases their potential energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.