ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2022
Diagnosis of cracked tooth: Clinical status and research progress.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical performance of lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers for restoring cracked teeth: A 2- to 4-year prospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Deep learning-driven super-resolution for cone-beam computed tomography: AnImaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Cracked teeth: a review of etiology, traditional detection methods, and novel diagnostic techniques.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of swept-source optical coherence tomography in the detection of tooth cracks: a narrative review.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Application of computer-aided design combined with 3-dimensional-printed guide in tooth autotransplantation: a case report.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Characteristics of cracks in posterior teeth and factors associated with symptoms: a cross-sectional practice-based observational study.Australian dental journal · 2025Observational
- Clinical comparison of direct and indirect class II composite restorations: a prospective 12-month follow-up study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Methods Used to Detect Cracked Teeth.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Trueness and depth discrepancy of post-space scans using an intraoral scanner: influence of preparation dimensions: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Human Tooth Crack Image Analysis with Multiple Deep Learning Approaches.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Fracture resistance and failure mode of three esthetic CAD-CAM post and core restorations.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Diagnosis of cracked tooth: Clinical status and research progress".The Japanese dental science review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cracked tooth is a common dental hard tissue disease.The involvement of cracks directly affects the selection of treatment and restoration of the affected teeth.It is helpful to choose more appropriate treatment options and evaluate the prognosis of the affected tooth accurately to determine the actual involvement of the crack.However, it is often difficult to accurately and quantitatively assess the scope of cracks at present.So it is necessary to find a real method of early quantitative and non-destructive crack detection.This article reviews the current clinical detection methods and research progress of cracked tooth in order to provide a reference for finding a clinical detection method for cracked tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.