Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425284›Full record

ArticleApplied psychological measurement2023

Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.

Kuan-Yu Jin, Chia-Ling Hsu, Ming Ming Chiu, Po-Hsi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychological measurement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A general dynamic learning model framework for cognitive diagnosis.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kuan-Yu JinAssessment Technology and Research Division, Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-7529
Chia-Ling HsuAssessment Technology and Research Division, Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-0980
Ming Ming ChiuThe Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-1971
Po-Hsi ChenNational Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In traditional test models, test items are independent, and test-takers slowly and thoughtfully respond to each test item. However, some test items have a common stimulus (dependent test items in a testlet), and sometimes test-takers lack motivation, knowledge, or time (speededness), so they perform rapid guessing (RG). Ignoring the dependence in responses to testlet items can negatively bias standard errors of measurement, and ignoring RG by fitting a simpler item response theory (IRT) model can bias the results. Because computer-based testing captures response times on testlet responses, we propose a mixture testlet IRT model with item responses and response time to model RG behaviors in computer-based testlet items. Two simulation studies with Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation using the JAGS program showed (a) good recovery of the item and person parameters in this new model and (b) the harmful consequences of ignoring RG (biased parameter estimates: overestimated item difficulties, underestimated time intensities, underestimated respondent latent speed parameters, and overestimated precision of respondent latent estimates). The application of IRT models with and without RG to data from a computer-based language test showed parameter differences resembling those in the simulations.

Indexed as

mixture modelmultidimensional item response theoryrapid guessing, testletresponse time

Identifiers

PMID36425284
PMCPMC9679923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.