ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022
Machine learning in clinical diagnosis, prognostication, and management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI): A systematic review.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the acute and sub-acute phases of spinal cord injury- a systematic review.Spinal cord · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis and Treatment of AcuteSpinal Cord Injury.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Guideline
- Early urodynamic profiles predict lower urinary tract recovery after spinal cord injury in female rats.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of neurons and spinal cord structures in immunofluorescence images using SpineDL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Challenges.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and Pressure Ulcer Development following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury; A Cross-sectional Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- [LLM-based extraction of clinical data: potentials and challenges].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Rebuilding spinal circuit function after spinal cord injury through a patient-specific interneuron precision model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- The preventive effect of emergency psychological intervention on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting Spinal Cord Injury Prognosis Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR AI · 2025Review
- Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Advances and New Therapies in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- The diagnostic and prognostic capability of artificial intelligence in spinal cord injury: A systematic review.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- The evolution of cervical spine trauma classification: a paradigm shift from morphological description to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury on T2-weighted MRI Scans.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Machine learning predicts improvement of functional outcomes in spinal cord injury patients after inpatient rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- An Overview of Adult Acute Traumatic Neurologic Injury for the Anesthesiologist:Current anesthesiology reports · 2025Article
- Scoping review of robotics technology in spinal surgery with highlights of the Annual Seattle Science Foundation Course.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence in the Comprehensive Management of Spinal Cord Injury.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning has been applied to improve diagnosis and prognostication of acute traumatic spinal cord injury. We investigate potential for clinical integration of machine learning in this patient population to navigate variability in injury and recovery. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines through PubMed database to identify studies that use machine learning algorithms for clinical application toward improvements in diagnosis, management, and predictive modeling. Results: Of the 132 records identified, a total of 13 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in final analysis. Of the 13 articles, 5 focused on diagnostic accuracy and 8 were related to prognostication or management of traumatic spinal cord injury. Across studies, 1983 patients with spinal cord injury were evaluated with most classifying as ASIA C or D. Retrospective designs were used in 10 of 13 studies and 3 were prospective. Studies focused on MRI evaluation and segmentation for diagnostic accuracy and prognostication, investigation of mean arterial pressure in acute care and intraoperative settings, prediction of ambulatory and functional ability, chronic complication prevention, and psychological quality of life assessments. Decision tree, random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), hierarchical cluster tree analysis (HCTA), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN) machine learning subtypes were used. Conclusions: Machine learning represents a platform technology with clinical application in traumatic spinal cord injury diagnosis, prognostication, management, rehabilitation, and risk prevention of chronic complications and mental illness. SVM models showed improved accuracy when compared to other ML subtypes surveyed. Inherent variability across patients with SCI offers unique opportunity for ML and personalized medicine to drive desired outcomes and assess risks in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.