Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425278›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

Focal Nasopharyngeal Activity Detected on [

Wai-Chung Wong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wai-Chung WongNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiology and Imaging, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-5570
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical significance of incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [ Methods: A total of 63 consecutive patients with incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [ Results: Incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake in two patients (3.2%, 2/63) was pathologically confirmed to be NPC. All the metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, NPR, MTV, and TLG) demonstrated significantly greater values in patients with NPC compared with patients with benign or physiological nasopharyngeal uptake ( Conclusion: NPC is an infrequent but important cause of incidental focal nasopharyngeal uptake on [

Indexed as

Metabolic tumor volumeNasopharyngeal carcinomaPositron emission tomography/computed tomographyStandardized uptake valueTotal lesion glycolysis

Identifiers

PMID36425278
PMCPMC9679055
OpenAlexW4295095008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.