Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425209›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Fly ash geopolymer as a coating material for controlled-release fertilizer based on granulated urea.

Rashidah Mohamed Hamidi, Ahmer Ali Siyal, Tero Luukkonen, Rashid M Shamsuddin, Muhammad Moniruzzaman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rashidah Mohamed HamidiHICoE, Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute of Self-sustainable Building, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Darul Ridzuan Malaysia mrashids@utp.edu.my.
Ahmer Ali SiyalHICoE, Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute of Self-sustainable Building, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Darul Ridzuan Malaysia mrashids@utp.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2533-3683
Tero LuukkonenUniversity of Oulu, Fibre and Particle Engineering Research Unit P.O. Box 8000 FI-90014 Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1124-775X
Rashid M ShamsuddinHICoE, Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR), Institute of Self-sustainable Building, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Darul Ridzuan Malaysia mrashids@utp.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-596X
Muhammad MoniruzzamanCentre of Research in Ionic Liquids (CORIL), Institute of Contaminant Management, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar Perak Darul Ridzuan Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-4159
Universiti Teknologi Petronas · MYUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen loss from urea fertiliser due to its high solubility characteristics has led to the invention of controlled release urea (CRU). Majority of existing CRU coatings are produced from a non-biodegradable, toxic and expensive synthetic polymers. This study determines the feasibility of fly ash-based geopolymer as a coating material for urea fertilizer. The effects of fly ash particle size (15.2 μm, 12.0 μm, and 8.6 μm) and solid to liquid (S : L) ratio (3 : 1, 2.8 : 1, 2.6 : 1, 2.4 : 1 and 2.2 : 1) on the geopolymer coating, the characterization such as FTIR analysis, XRD analysis, surface area and pore size analysis, setting time analysis, coating thickness, and crushing strength, and the release kinetics of geopolymer coated urea in water and soil were determined. Lower S : L ratio was beneficial in terms of workability, but it had an adverse impact on geopolymer properties where it increased porosity and decreased mechanical strength to an undesirable level for the CRU application. Geopolymer coated urea prepared from the finest fly ash fraction and lowest S : L ratio demonstrated high mechanical strength and slower urea release profile. Complete urea release was obtained in 132 minutes in water and 15 days in soil from geopolymer-coated urea whereas for uncoated urea it took only 20 minutes in water and 3 days in soil. Thus, geopolymer can potentially be used as a coating material for urea fertilizer to replace commonly used expensive and biodegradable polymer-based coatings.

Identifiers

PMID36425209
PMCPMC9677526
OpenAlexW4310330811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.