Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425115›Full record

ArticleLearning and motivation2021

Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in adults.

Katelyn A Carr, Kelseanna Hollis-Hansen, Kelsey Austin, Leonard H Epstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning and motivation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn A CarrDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, United States.
Kelseanna Hollis-HansenSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, United States.
Kelsey AustinDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, United States.
Leonard H EpsteinDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14214, United States.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Can reinforcing alternatives to food prevent weight gain in children?R01HD088131 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Research Training to Promote Scientist Diversity & Health Equity in Cardiovascular & Lung DiseaseT32HL140290 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Yessenia Castro, Catherine Cubbin · 2018 to 2026
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL140290NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting (DD) describes choices between small, immediate rewards and larger, delayed rewards. Individuals who are high in DD favor small, immediate rewards, and this preference is related to health behaviors including higher energy intake, smoking and less physical activity. Episodic future thinking (EFT) is an intervention in which one thinks about personal positive future events and this decreases DD in adults and children. In previous studies episodic events have been presented as written or auditory cues. Episodic future images are also imagined visually, but the impact of personal visual cues has not been tested. Research examining sensory modality and semantic memory has shown drawn items are associated with better recall than writing or viewing provided images. This study compared drawn versus written episodic future or recent cues on DD. Sixty-nine adults were randomized to one of three groups; EFT-written, EFT-drawn or Episodic recent thinking (ERT)-written cues, and completed a computerized adjusting amount DD task cued with episodic events. Results showed both written and drawn EFT cues had a larger effect on DD than ERT-written cues and individual differences in immediate time perspective moderated this effect. This suggests that drawn and written cues can have similar effects on DD, providing future clinical work flexibility in how to present cues in the field. In addition, presenting drawn cues may improve DD for individuals who have an immediate time perspective.

Indexed as

Delay discountingDrawingEpisodic future thinkingTime perspective

Identifiers

PMID36425115
PMCPMC9683185
OpenAlexW3157445570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.