ReviewBiophysical reports2022
Chromatin as self-returning walks: From population to single cell and back.
Review in Biophysical reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Architecture and regulation of nanoscale chromatin domains.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Formamide denaturation of double-stranded DNA for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) distorts nanoscale chromatin structure.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With a growing understanding of the chromatin structure, many efforts remain focused on bridging the gap between what is suggested by population-averaged data and what is visualized for single cells. A popular approach to traversing these scales is to fit a polymer model to Hi-C contact data. However, Hi-C is an average of millions to billions of cells, and each cell may not contain all population-averaged contacts. Therefore, we employ a novel approach of summing individual chromosome trajectories-determined by our Self-Returning Random Walk model-to create populations of cells. We allow single cells to consist of disparate structures and reproduce a variety of experimentally relevant contact maps. We show that the amount of shared topology between cells, and their mechanism of formation, changes the population-averaged structure. Therefore, we present a modeling technique that, with few constraints and little oversight, can be used to understand which single-cell chromatin structures underlie population-averaged behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.