Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425083›Full record

ArticleBiophysical reports2022

Modeling multiple duplex DNA attachments in a force-extension experiment.

Allan Raudsepp, Martin A K Williams, Geoffrey B Jameson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allan RaudseppSchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Martin A K WilliamsSchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Geoffrey B JamesonSchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical tweezers-based DNA stretching often relies on tethering a single end-activated DNA molecule between optically manipulated end-binding beads. Measurement success can depend on DNA concentration. At lower DNA concentrations tethering is less common, and many trials may be required to observe a single-molecule stretch. At higher DNA concentrations tethering is more common; however, the resulting force-extensions observed are more complex and may vary from measurement to measurement. Typically these more complex results are attributed to the formation of multiple tethers between the beads; however, to date there does not appear to have been a critical examination of this hypothesis or the potential usefulness of such data. Here we examine stretches at a higher DNA concentration and use analysis and simulation to show how the more complex force-extensions observed can be understood in terms of multiple DNA attachments.

Identifiers

PMID36425083
PMCPMC9680770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.