ArticleCureus2022
COVID-19 vs. Influenza: A Chest X-ray Comparison.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified lung ultrasound score for improved monitoring of pARDS on ECMO, a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Degree of Chest CT Scan Abnormalities in COVID-19 and Influenza Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
- At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 and influenza are primarily respiratory diseases, have similar symptoms with most patients developing mild to moderate illness, and show similar features on chest X-rays. We hypothesize that patients seeking treatments at the emergency department (ED) due to COVID-19 or influenza infection will have similar severity levels of features on chest X-rays, with most of them demonstrating normal to mildly abnormal chest X-ray findings. Methods Chest X-ray images of 312 COVID-19 patients and 312 influenza patients were obtained from the teaching files of a general diagnostic radiologist. Images from each of these two groups were reviewed and classified. Based on the severity levels of lung abnormalities, each image was categorized into one of four categories: normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal. The total number of images in each category within each disease group was counted, and the percentage was calculated compared to the total number of images analyzed in that group. Results from both groups were then compared. Results The severity levels of chest X-ray abnormalities were similar between the COVID-19 group and the COVID-negative influenza group at the time of ED visits, with most images being normal or mildly abnormal. The percentages of the images categorized as normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, and severely abnormal in the COVID-19 group and the influenza group were 38-39%, 28-29%, 22-21%, and 12-11%, respectively. Conclusion Our findings suggest that in the ED setting, no distinction can be made between COVID-19 and Influenza infections if based just on chest X-rays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.