Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2022

Reproducing and quantitatively validating a biologically-constrained point-neuron model of CA1 pyramidal cells.

Shailesh Appukuttan, Andrew P Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shailesh AppukuttanUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Saclay, France.
Andrew P DavisonUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Saclay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have attempted to reproduce a biologically-constrained point-neuron model of CA1 pyramidal cells. The original models, developed for the Brian simulator, captured the frequency-current profiles of both strongly and weakly adapting cells. As part of the present study, we reproduced the model for different simulators, namely Brian2 and NEURON. The reproductions were attempted independent of the original Brian implementation, relying solely on the published article. The different implementations were quantitatively validated, to evaluate how well they mirror the original model. Additional tests were developed and packaged into a test suite, that helped further characterize and compare various aspects of these models, beyond the scope of the original study. Overall, we were able to reproduce the core features of the model, but observed certain unaccountable discrepancies. We demonstrate an approach for undertaking these evaluations, using the SciUnit framework, that allows for such quantitative validations of scientific models, to verify their accurate replication and/or reproductions. All resources employed and developed in our study have been publicly shared

Indexed as

EBRAINS Model CatalogreproducibilitySciUnittestingvalidationverification

Identifiers

PMID36424953
PMCPMC9679150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.