Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424890›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2022

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Strain Selection: Guidance From Influenza.

Arnold S Monto, Adam S Lauring, Emily T Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The tricky second album: Licensure of an mRNA vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arnold S MontoCenter for Respiratory Virus Research and Response, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Adam S LauringDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emily T MartinCenter for Respiratory Virus Research and Response, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS 75N9302.1C.00015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When first approved, many hoped that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine would provide long-term protection after a primary series. Waning of immunity and continued appearance of new variants has made booster inoculations necessary. The process is becoming increasingly similar to that used for annual updating of the influenza vaccine. The similarity has become even more apparent with selection of BA.4/BA.5 as the Omicron strain of the updated bivalent (Original + Omicron) COVID-19 vaccines. It is hoped that, if COVID-19 develops winter seasonality, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will require only annual review to determine if updates are necessary. Recommendations on whom should receive the booster would be based on conditions at that time.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19influenzainfluenza vaccinesmRNA vaccinesSARS-CoV2 vaccinesvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36424890
PMCPMC10205617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.