ArticleESC heart failure2023
Dynamic aspects of ventricular interaction during exercise in HFpEF and in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine-learning-based prediction of respiratory flow and lung volume from real-time cardiac MRI using MR-compatible spirometry.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Cardiac structural and functional changes in OSAHS patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Dynamic aspects of ventricular interaction during exercise in HFpEF and in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe contribution of adverse ventricular interdependence remains undervalued in heart failure or pulmonary vascular disease, and not much is known about its dynamic nature during exercise and respiration. In this study, we evaluated ventricular interaction during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) as compared with healthy controls. METHODS AND
resultsForty-six subjects (10 controls, 19 CTEPH patients, and 17 HFpEF patients) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during exercise. Ventricular interaction was determined through analysis of the septal curvature (SC) of a mid-ventricular short-axis slice at end-diastole, end-systole, and early-diastole, both in expiration and inspiration. Exercise amplified ventricular interaction in CTEPH patients and to a lesser extent in HFpEF patients (P < 0.05 for decrease in SC with exercise). Adverse interaction was most profound in early-diastole and most pronounced in CTEPH patients (P < 0.05 interaction group * exercise) because of a disproportionate increase RV afterload (P < 0.05 to both controls and HFpEF) and diastolic pericardial restraint (P < 0.001 for interaction group * exercise) during exercise. Inspiration enhanced diastolic interdependence in CTEPH and HFpEF patients (P < 0.05 vs. expiration). Both at rest and during exercise, SC strongly correlated with RV volumes and pulmonary artery pressures (all P < 0.05).
conclusionsExercise amplifies adverse right-left ventricular interactions in CTEPH, while a more moderate effect is observed in isolated post-capillary HFpEF. Given the strong link with RV function and pulmonary hemodynamic, assessing ventricular interaction with exCMR might be valuable from a diagnostic or therapeutic perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.