Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424597›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Identification of clinical factors related to prediction of alcohol use disorder from electronic health records using feature selection methods.

Ali Ebrahimi, Uffe Kock Wiil, Amin Naemi, Marjan Mansourvar, Kjeld Andersen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Classification of Alcohol Use Disorder With Explainable AI.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali EbrahimiSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. aleb@mmmi.sdu.dk.
Uffe Kock WiilSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Amin NaemiSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Marjan MansourvarDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kjeld AndersenUnit for Clinical Alcohol Research, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anette Søgaard NielsenUnit for Clinical Alcohol Research, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKMaersk (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh dimensionality in electronic health records (EHR) causes a significant computational problem for any systematic search for predictive, diagnostic, or prognostic patterns. Feature selection (FS) methods have been indicated to be effective in feature reduction as well as in identifying risk factors related to prediction of clinical disorders. This paper examines the prediction of patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) using machine learning (ML) and attempts to identify risk factors related to the diagnosis of AUD.

methodsA FS framework consisting of two operational levels, base selectors and ensemble selectors. The first level consists of five FS methods: three filter methods, one wrapper method, and one embedded method. Base selector outputs are aggregated to develop four ensemble FS methods. The outputs of FS method were then fed into three ML algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest (RF) to compare and identify the best feature subset for the prediction of AUD from EHRs.

resultsIn terms of feature reduction, the embedded FS method could significantly reduce the number of features from 361 to 131. In terms of classification performance, RF based on 272 features selected by our proposed ensemble method (Union FS) with the highest accuracy in predicting patients with AUD, 96%, outperformed all other models in terms of AUROC, AUPRC, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. Considering the limitations of embedded and wrapper methods, the best overall performance was achieved by our proposed Union Filter FS, which reduced the number of features to 223 and improved Precision, Recall, and F1-Score in RF from 0.77, 0.65, and 0.71 to 0.87, 0.81, and 0.84, respectively. Our findings indicate that, besides gender, age, and length of stay at the hospital, diagnosis related to digestive organs, bones, muscles and connective tissue, and the nervous systems are important clinical factors related to the prediction of patients with AUD.

conclusionOur proposed FS method could improve the classification performance significantly. It could identify clinical factors related to prediction of AUD from EHRs, thereby effectively helping clinical staff to identify and treat AUD patients and improving medical knowledge of the AUD condition. Moreover, the diversity of features among female and male patients as well as gender disparity were investigated using FS methods and ML techniques.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCluster AnalysisElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleSupport Vector MachineAlcohol use disorderClinical factor identificationFeature selectionGender disparityMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36424597
PMCPMC9686074
OpenAlexW4309890141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.