Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424554›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Impact of choice of nostril on nasotracheal intubation when using video rigid stylet: a randomized clinical trial.

Li-Kuan Wang, Xiang Zhang, Hai-Yin Wu, Tong Cheng, Guo-Li Xiong, Xu-Dong Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05218590 (For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better? A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05218590 nacompletednot on this map

For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better? A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsIntubation, Video Rigid StyletArmsVideo rigid stylet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Kuan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China.
Hai-Yin WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China.
Tong ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China.
Guo-Li XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China.
Xu-Dong YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100000, China. kqyangxudong@163.com.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia usually require nasotracheal intubation. When presented with patients with equally patent nostrils, selection of the nostril to use for intubation is an important decision for facilitating intubation. The objective of this trial is to determine whether choice of nostril impacts nasotracheal intubation when using a video rigid stylet in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.

methodsFifty patients scheduled for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation were randomly allocated into two groups to undergo nasotracheal intubation through the left nostril (Group L, n = 25) or the right nostril (Group R, n = 25). Intubation was performed by experienced anesthesiologists using a video rigid stylet. The primary endpoint was time to successful intubation, which was defined as the duration from when the tip of the stylet-tube assembly entered the selected nostril to when the tube entered the trachea. Secondary outcomes included: length of time for device insertion; length of time for tube insertion; total success rate; first-attempt success rate; number of intubation attempts; requirement of airway assisted maneuvers; incidence and severity of epistaxis. Intubation-related adverse events were monitored for up to postoperative 24 h.

resultsMedian time (interquartile range) to tracheal intubation was 25.3 seconds (20.7 to 27.6) in Group L and 26.8 seconds (22.5 to 30.0) in Group R (median difference (MD) = 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.8 to 5.7, P = 0.248). Nasotracheal intubation was successful in all patients in both groups and the first-attempt success rates in both groups were similar (Group L: 96% (24/25); Group R: 96% (24/25); relative risk (RR) 1.0; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1; P > 0.999). No significant difference of requirement of assisted maneuvers was noted between the two groups (Group L: 36% (9/25); Group R: 28% (7/25); RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.3-1.8; P = 0.544). Furthermore, all patients showed a high quality of visualization of the glottis (Cormack and Lehane Grade I). For safety outcomes, the incidence and severity of epistaxis during intubation was comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the selection of nostrils and intubation-related adverse events up to 24 h after surgery.

conclusionsWhen considering which nostril to use for intubation with video rigid stylet, either nostril can be used similarly.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT05218590.

Indexed as

EpistaxisIntubation, IntratrachealAnesthesia, GeneralGlottisHumansTracheaEpistaxisIntubation timeNasotracheal intubationVideo stylet

Identifiers

PMID36424554
PMCPMC9686091
OpenAlexW4309889650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.