ArticleBMC cancer2022
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant patchy ground-glass opacity by thin-section computed tomography.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced management strategy of synchronous percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation in patients with lung ground-glass opacities undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a clinical perspective on our experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Integrating multimodal features to predict the malignancy of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a multicenter prospective model development and validation study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A clinical spectrum of resectable lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary component (MPC) concurrently presenting as mixed ground-glass opacity nodules.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- The value of interlobar fissure semilunar sign based on multifactor joint analysis in predicting the invasiveness of ground glass nodules with interlobar fissure attachment in the lungs.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Progressive changes in non-neoplastic ground-glass nodules on follow-up computed tomography (CT).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Imaging diagnostics of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a narrative review with current status and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Prediction of the Benign or Malignant Nature of Pulmonary Pure Ground-Glass Nodules Based on Radiomics Analysis of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Images.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Potential Role of Intrapulmonary Concomitant Lesions in Differentiating Non-Neoplastic and Neoplastic Ground Glass Nodules.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
- The Value of Topological Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Malignant Risk of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: A Multi-Center Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies confirmed that ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with certain CT manifestations had a higher probability of malignancy. However, differentiating patchy ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and GGNs has not been discussed solely. This study aimed to investigate the differences between the CT features of benign and malignant patchy GGOs to improve the differential diagnosis.
methodsFrom January 2016 to September 2021, 226 patients with 247 patchy GGOs (103 benign and 144 malignant) confirmed by postoperative pathological examination or follow-up were retrospectively enrolled. Their clinical and CT data were reviewed, and their CT features were compared. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to reveal the predictors of malignancy.
resultsCompared to patients with benign patchy GGOs, malignant cases were older (P < 0.001), had a lower incidence of malignant tumor history (P = 0.003), and more commonly occurred in females (P = 0.012). Based on CT images, there were significant differences in the location, distribution, density pattern, internal bronchial changes, and boundary between malignant and benign GGOs (P < 0.05). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent predictors of malignant GGOs were the following: patient age ≥ 58 years [odds ratio (OR), 2.175; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.135-6.496; P = 0.025], locating in the upper lobe (OR, 5.481; 95%CI, 2.027-14.818; P = 0.001), distributing along the bronchovascular bundles (OR, 12.770; 95%CI, 4.062-40.145; P < 0.001), centrally distributed solid component (OR, 3.024; 95%CI, 1.124-8.133; P = 0.028), and well-defined boundary (OR, 5.094; 95%CI, 2.079-12.482; P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn older patients (≥58 years), well-defined patchy GGOs with centric solid component, locating in the upper lobe, and distributing along the bronchovascular bundles should be highly suspected as malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.