ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023
Comparison of LGE quantitation methods in cardiac sarcoidosis to predict clinical outcomes.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Diagnostic Support Software for Phase Estimation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Multi-sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement quantification techniques in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases (ReLate study).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Association of left atrial size and function by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with long term outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to investigate the optimal method of quantifying late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We retrospectively studied 53 patients with CS. LGE quantitation was performed using (a) semi-automated segmentation using Signal Threshold versus Reference Mean (STRM) cutoffs of > 2, > 3 and > 5 standard deviations (SD); (b) full-width-half-max (FWHM) method and (c) manual segmentation (MS) of affected myocardial segments. Primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA). A multivariate regression analysis was performed comparing the techniques adjusting for age, gender, NYHA class and LVEF. Mean age was 56.3 ± 12 years, 71.6% males, 66% white. Mean LVEF was 45.1% ± 14.7%. Over median follow-up of 28.1 months, 2 patients had cardiac death (3.7%) and 8 (15.1%) had VTA. On multivariate analysis, MS, > 2SD, > 3SD, > 5SD and FWHM had OR of 1.39 [CI 1.04-1.79], 1.09 [CI 0.99-1.21], 1.15 [CI 1.03-1.29], 1.16 [CI 1.04-1.27] and 1.08 [CI 0.96-1.21], respectively, for predicting the composite outcome. ROC curve analysis showed MS to have the highest AUC 0.89 followed by 0.81 for > 3SD and > 5SD, 0.75 for > 2SD and lowest 0.69 for FWHM method. Reproducibility was lower for manual method (ICC 0.7) than for > 3SD (ICC 0.991) and > 5SD (ICC 0.997). CS quantitation of LGE with MS or semi-automated quantitation with STRM > 3SD or > 5SD was significantly associated with the composite outcome of cardiac death and VTA. Semi-automated quantitation with STRM > 3SD provided the best combination of accuracy and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36424508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.