Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424451›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Body transfer illusions in the schizophrenia spectrum: a systematic review.

Kira Baum, Julia Hackmann, Julian Pakos, Kyra Kannen, Annika Wiebe, Benjamin Selaskowski, Max C Pensel, Ulrich Ettinger, Alexandra Philipsen, Niclas Braun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kira Baum *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Julia Hackmann *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Julian Pakos *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kyra KannenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Annika WiebeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6434-3553
Benjamin SelaskowskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-8265
Max C PenselDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-2269
Ulrich EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0160-0281
Alexandra PhilipsenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Niclas BraunDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. niclas.braun@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-1244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia has been viewed as a disorder of the self. Accordingly, the question arises if and how senses of ownership and agency are impaired in schizophrenia. To address this question, several body transfer illusions (BTIs) have been investigated in schizophrenia patients and other schizophrenia spectrum (SCZ-S) populations. The objective of the study was to systematically review the current evidence from BTIs in the SCZ-S. A systematic literature search in PubMed and CENTRAL (search date: February 12, 2022) was conducted on BTI studies carried out in SCZ-S populations. Studies were included if they were published in English after peer review, reported original research data, related to the SCZ-S, and used a BTI as its study method. Conference papers, study protocols, and reviews were excluded. For each included BTI study, various study characteristics and outcomes were retrieved, and a risk-of-bias score was calculated based on six study quality criteria. K = 40 studies were identified, of which k = 20 studies met the eligibility criteria. For BTI paradigms using visuotactile stimulation, most studies found elevated sense of ownership ratings in SCZ-S populations compared to healthy controls (HC). Implicit illusion measures (e.g., proprioceptive drift), in turn, did not generally indicate elevated embodiment levels in SCZ-S populations. Likewise, no consistent group differences emerged between SCZ-S populations and HC with respect to BTI paradigms using visuomotor stimulation. Furthermore, BTI vividness was found to correlate significantly with core symptoms of schizophrenia and various subclinical characteristics related to the SCZ-S. In line with the self-disturbance hypothesis, SCZ-S populations appear to be affected by aberrations in bodily self-awareness. Review registration: PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42022287960).

Identifiers

PMID36424451
PMCPMC9691625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.