ArticleScientific reports2022
Biomarkers for rhythmic and discrete dynamic primitives in locomotion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovering individual-specific gait signatures from data-driven models of neuromechanical dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rehabilitation can promote brain plasticity and improve motor control after central nervous system injuries. Our working model is that motor control is encoded using dynamic primitives: submovements, oscillations, and mechanical impedances. We hypothesize that therapies focusing on these primitives can achieve greater motor recovery. At the observational level, these primitives lead to discrete and rhythmic movements. Here, we propose two novel biomarkers to evaluate rhythmic and discrete movements in gait based on the feet forward position: the smoothness of their relative position, using the mean-squared jerk ratio (MSJR), to assess rhythmicity; and the angle between principal components of consecutive trajectories (dPCA), to detect discrete movements amidst rhythmic motion. We applied these methods to kinematic data collected with healthy individuals during experiments employing the MIT-Skywalker: level-ground walking at five speeds, with and without imposed ankle stiffness; walking at constant speed on ascending, descending, and laterally tilted slopes; and performing sidesteps. We found a decrease in MSJR as speed increases, related to increased rhythmicity, even with imposed stiffness. Rhythmicity seems unaffected by the terrain perturbations imposed. Finally, dPCA successfully detects sidesteps, discrete events amidst rhythmic movement. These biomarkers appear to accurately assess rhythmic and discrete movements during walking and can potentially improve clinical evaluation and rehabilitation of neurological patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.